Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 474
Filtrar
1.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 18: e83, 2024 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695197

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to reveal the relationship between nursing students' disaster response self-efficacy and their disaster preparedness perceptions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on nursing students after a major earthquake that occurred in Turkey on February 6, 2023 (n = 302). Data collection took place from June 2023 to October 2023, using the Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale (DRSES) and Disaster Preparedness Perception Scale (DPPS). Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Nursing students' DRSES mean score was 63.35 ± 10.83 (moderate level) and DPPS mean score was 3.41 ± 0.50 (high level). A positive and moderate correlation was found between nursing students' DRSES and DPPS scores (r = 0.515; P = 0.000). Predictors affecting nursing students' disaster preparedness are disaster response self-efficacy score, being male, and making a family disaster plan. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the importance of increasing the disaster response self-efficacy needed by nursing students to successfully assist patients in disaster situations.


Assuntos
Terremotos , Autoeficácia , Estudantes de Enfermagem , Humanos , Estudantes de Enfermagem/psicologia , Estudantes de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Turquia , Feminino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Terremotos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Defesa Civil/métodos , Defesa Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Defesa Civil/normas , Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Psicometria/instrumentação , Psicometria/métodos
3.
J Environ Radioact ; 270: 107298, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797405

RESUMO

The Accident Reporting and Guiding Operational System (ARGOS) is a decision support system used to assist in the Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) to nuclear and radiological incidents. The ARGOS user group has been formed that is made up of government agencies across many countries that have a role in EPR to nuclear and radiological incidents. In 2020, a desktop exercise was organised for the members of the ARGOS user group. The exercise involved two hypothetical accidents at different times on the same date, namely a radiological release from a floating nuclear power plant (NPP) off the Norwegian coast and from the Loviisa NPP in Finland. The objectives of the exercise were to train and increase knowledge of the ARGOS system, to perform a comparison of model outputs, and to compare the recommendations of protective actions. In the case of the floating NPP the source term was provided, while in the Loviisa NPP scenario the participants were required to provide their own source term based on a description of the accident. The results on radiological consequences based on dispersion modelling, protective actions, source terms and dispersion modelling settings were collected from participants. A comparison was made between each of these reported aspects. In general, it was found that there was general agreement between the results for the floating nuclear power plant scenario in the sense of plume direction and extent, while in the case of the Loviisa NPP scenario, there was much greater variation, with the difference in source term estimates between the participants being an influencing factor. The participants acknowledged that taking part in an exercise of this nature increased their knowledge and understanding about using decision support tools such as ARGOS in planning and responding to nuclear and radiological emergencies.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil , Monitoramento de Radiação , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Humanos , Defesa Civil/métodos , Centrais Nucleares , Finlândia
4.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 17: e318, 2023 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36789650

RESUMO

Mass Casualty Incidents recently increased in intensity and frequency at an unprecedented rate globally. On August 4, 2020, a massive blast hit the Port of Beirut severely damaging its healthcare sector. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of the Beirut blast on acute care hospitals in the Beirut area, with a focus on understanding healthcare professionals' (HCPs) responses and encountered challenges. A qualitative research design method was adopted to evaluate the experiences of HCPs at acute hospitals located within 5 kilometers of the blast epicenter. 9 hospitals participated in the study. 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informant HCPs using a designed interview guide. HCPs reported severe infrastructural damages in their corresponding hospitals, and 2 were completely non-functional post-blast. Other than physical injuries sustained by HCPs, the blast imposed substantial strains on their mental health, exacerbated by the ongoing socio-economic crises in Lebanon. Moreover, the findings revealed critical challenges which hindered hospitals' emergency responses at the level of communication, coordination, and human resources, as well as supplies. Participants urged for the need to conduct proper triage, arrange emergency operating centers, and deploy outdoor treatment tents among others, to effectively respond to future disasters. The Beirut blast overwhelmed the Lebanese healthcare system and challenged its level of emergency preparedness. This generated evidence to address the deficiencies and strengthen the existing hospitals' emergency response plans. Future efforts should include prioritizing hospitals' emergency preparedness to ensure the provision of care at increased capacity following the impact of a large-scale disaster.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil , Planejamento em Desastres , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Humanos , Defesa Civil/métodos , Triagem/métodos , Hospitais
5.
BMJ Open ; 12(11): e062624, 2022 11 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36414313

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A systematic review was conducted with the aims of identifying sectors mentioned in the public health emergency preparedness and response (PHEPR) literature and mapping the involvement of those sectors in the seven PHEPR cycle domains. SETTING: A detailed search strategy was conducted in Embase and Scopus, covering the period between 1 January 2005 and 1 January 2020. METHODS: Published articles focusing on preparedness for and/or response to public health emergencies of multiple origins on the European continent were included. The frequency with which predetermined sectors were mentioned when describing collaboration during the preparedness and response cycle was determined. RESULTS: The results show that description of the involvement of sectors in PHEPR in general and collaboration during PHEPR is predominantly confined to a limited number of sectors, namely 'Governmental institutions', 'Human health industry', 'Experts' and 'Civil Society'. Description is also limited to only three domains of the PHEPR cycle, namely 'Risk and crisis management', 'Pre-event preparations and governance' and 'Surveillance'. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal preparedness and response require predefined collaboration with a broader scope of partners than currently seems to be the case based on this literature review. We recommend considering these outcomes when planning multisectoral collaboration during preparedness and response, as well as the need to further operationalise the term 'multisectoral collaboration' during PHEPRs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO with registration number 176 331.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil , Humanos , Defesa Civil/métodos , Saúde Pública/métodos
6.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 17: e111, 2022 03 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35264273

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Health-Care Coalitions (HCCs) provide an important emergency response safety net function across the United States in preparedness and responses to disasters. A key challenge is the variation in the maturity and operational readiness of HCCs. The purpose of this study was to identify key tenets that define high-functioning HCCs and help mature HCCs into a higher-functioning state of operations. METHODS: This was a qualitative study based on grounded theory methodology using semi-structured interviews for data collection and thematic analysis. Participants were stakeholders (n = 39) of HCCs from across the United States at local, state, and federal levels. RESULTS: Through an institutional logics lens, the 3 key attributes for high functioning-HCCs were identified as (1) having an established and growing partnership, (2) being value-driven culture, and (3) being response ready. In addition, 3 logics were deemed essential for guiding HCCs: sources of governance, sources of partner engagement, and sources of sustainability. Participant responses describe the importance of these attributes and logics in influencing decision-making processes, supporting a community's resilience during a disaster, and fostering robust relationships among community partners. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing these attributes and logics in planning and management of HCCs can help establish the foundation for partner collaborations and high-functioning HCCs.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil , Planejamento em Desastres , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Defesa Civil/métodos , Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Liderança , Comportamento Cooperativo , Pesquisa Qualitativa
7.
Br J Anaesth ; 128(2): e97-e100, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34865825

RESUMO

With healthcare systems rapidly becoming overwhelmed and occupied by patients during a pandemic, effective and safe care for patients is easily compromised. During the course of the current pandemic, numerous treatment guidelines have been developed and published that have improved care for patients with COVID-19. Certain lessons have only been learned during the course of the outbreak, from which we can learn for future pandemics. This editorial aims to raise awareness about the importance of timely stockpiling of sufficient amounts of personal protection equipment and medications, adequate oxygen supplies, uninterrupted electricity, and fair locally adapted triage strategies.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Defesa Civil/métodos , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/prevenção & controle , Triagem/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Saúde Global , Humanos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual
8.
Can J Cardiol ; 38(2): 279-291, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34863912

RESUMO

While COVID-19 is still ongoing and associated with more than 5 million deaths, the scope and speed of advances over the past year in terms of scientific discovery, data dissemination, and technology have been staggering. It is not a matter of "if" but "when" we will face the next pandemic, and how we leverage technology and data management effectively to create flexible ecosystems that facilitate collaboration, equitable care, and innovation will determine its severity and scale. The aim of this review is to address emerging challenges that came to light during the pandemic in health care and innovations that enabled us to adapt and continue to care for patients. The pandemic highlighted the need for seismic shifts in care paradigms and technology with considerations related to the digital divide and health literacy for digital health interventions to reach full potential and improve health outcomes. We discuss advances in telemedicine, remote patient monitoring, and emerging wearable technologies. Despite the promise of digital health, we emphasise the importance of addressing its limitations, including interpretation challenges, accuracy of findings, and artificial intelligence-driven algorithms. We summarise the most recent recommendation of the Virtual Care Task Force to scaling virtual medical services in Canada. Finally, we propose a model for optimal implementation of health digital innovations with 5 tenets including data management, data security, digital biomarkers, useful artificial intelligence, and clinical integration.


Assuntos
Tecnologia Biomédica , Defesa Civil/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Inteligência Artificial , Tecnologia Biomédica/normas , Tecnologia Biomédica/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Tecnologia Digital , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Br J Anaesth ; 128(2): e100-e103, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34565522

RESUMO

Efficiency is an essential part of sustainable healthcare, especially in emergency and acute care (including surgical) settings. Waste minimisation, streamlined processes, and lean principles are all important for responsible stewardship of finite health resources. However, the promotion of efficiency above all else has effectively subordinated preparedness as a form of waste. Investment in preparedness is an essential part of resilient healthcare. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the gap between efficient processes and resilient systems in many health settings. In anticipation of future pandemics, natural disasters, and mass casualty incidents, health systems, and individual healthcare workers, must prioritise preparedness to be ready for the unexpected or for crises. This requires a reframing of priorities to view preparedness as crucial insurance against system failure during disasters, by taking advantage of lessons learnt preparing for war and mass casualty incidents.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Defesa Civil/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Defesa Civil/tendências , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Pessoal de Saúde/tendências , Humanos
11.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 22(9): 701-705, 2021 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34714259

RESUMO

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has thoroughly and deeply affected the provision of healthcare services worldwide. In order to limit the in-hospital infections and to redistribute the healthcare professionals, cardiac percutaneous intervention in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) patients were limited to urgent or emergency ones. The aim of this article is to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Pediatric and ACHD cath laboratory activity during the so-called 'hard lockdown' in Italy. Eleven out of 12 Italian institutions with a dedicated Invasive Cardiology Unit in Congenital Heart Disease actively participated in the survey. The interventional cardiology activity was reduced by more than 50% in 6 out of 11 centers. Adolescent and ACHD patients suffered the highest rate of reduction. There was an evident discrepancy in the management of the hard lockdown, irrespective of the number of COVID-19 positive cases registered, with a higher reduction in Southern Italy compared with the most affected regions (Lombardy, Piedmont, Veneto and Emilia Romagna). Although the pandemic was brilliantly addressed in most cases, we recognize the necessity for planning new, and hopefully homogeneous, strategies in order to be prepared for an upcoming new outbreak.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Controle de Infecções , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Defesa Civil/métodos , Defesa Civil/tendências , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Inovação Organizacional , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 35(3): 369-376, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34511225

RESUMO

Hospitals face catastrophic financial challenges in light of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Acute shortages in materials such as masks, ventilators, intensive care unit capacity, and personal protective equipment (PPE) are a significant concern. The future success of supply chain management involves increasing the transparency of where our raw materials are sourced, diversifying of our product resources, and improving our technology that is able to predict potential shortages. It is also important to develop a proactive budgeting strategy to meet supply demands through early designation of dependable roles to support organizations and through the education of healthcare staff. In this paper, we discuss supply chain management, governance and financing, emergency protocols, including emergency procurement and supply chain, supply chain gaps and how to address them, and the importance of communication in the times of crisis.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Gestão de Recursos da Equipe de Assistência à Saúde/métodos , Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares/provisão & distribuição , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , COVID-19/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Defesa Civil/economia , Defesa Civil/métodos , Gestão de Recursos da Equipe de Assistência à Saúde/economia , Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares/economia , Humanos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/economia
13.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 35(3): 697-716, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34362539

RESUMO

The built environment has been integral to response to the global pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). In particular, engineering controls to mitigate risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and other newly emergent respiratory pathogens in the future will be important. Anticipating emergence from this pandemic, or at least adaptation given increasing administration of effective vaccines, and the safety of patients, personnel, and others in health care facilities remain the core goals. This article summarizes known risks and highlights prevention strategies for daily care as well as response to emergent infectious diseases and this parapandemic phase.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Defesa Civil , Instalações de Saúde/tendências , Controle de Infecções , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Defesa Civil/métodos , Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Ambiente Controlado , Arquitetura Hospitalar/métodos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2
15.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 253-256, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34167048

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Many trusted organizations recommend a particular set of gear for hikers. Termed the "10 essentials," the importance of these items to wilderness preparedness has not been critically evaluated. We sought to better understand the value of these items in day hiker preparedness by assessing the association between carried items, the occurrence of adverse events, and satisfaction. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted at Mount Monadnock (NH) over 4 non-consecutive days. Adults finishing a day hike were invited to participate. The survey assessed items carried, adverse events, satisfaction, and whether hikers felt prepared for the adverse events that occurred. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an adverse event. RESULTS: A total sample of 961 hikers reported 1686 adverse events. Hikers felt prepared for 89% of the events experienced. The most common adverse events reported were thirst (62%), hunger (50%), feeling cold (18%), and needing rain gear (11%). Medical events such as sprains and lacerations made up 18% of all adverse events. Carrying more items was associated with an increased likelihood of reporting an adverse event and a decreased likelihood of adverse events that the hiker was not prepared for, without a change in satisfaction rates. CONCLUSIONS: Carrying more items did not translate into improved satisfaction for day hikers, but was associated with fewer events for which the hiker was unprepared. Other than adverse events related to hunger, thirst, weather, and minor medical events, adverse events were unlikely during this day hike. Nutrition, hydration, and insulation were the items reported as most often needed, followed by a kit to treat minor medical events, while the remaining 6 items were infrequently used.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil/métodos , Natureza , Satisfação Pessoal , Caminhada/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Defesa Civil/normas , Defesa Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Hampshire , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
Emerg Med J ; 38(10): 765-768, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34039644

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A major incident is any emergency requiring special arrangements by the emergency services. All hospitals are required by law to keep a major incident plan (MIP) detailing the response to such events. In 2006 and 2019, we assessed the preparedness and knowledge of key individuals in hospitals across England and found a substantial gap in responding to the MIP. In this report, we compare responses from doctors at major trauma centres (MTCs) and other hospitals (non-MTCs). METHODS: We identified trusts in England that received over 30 000 patients through the ED in the fourth quarter of 2016/2017. We contacted the on-call anaesthetic, emergency, general surgery and trauma and orthopaedic registrar at each location and asked three questions assessing their confidence in using their hospital's MIP: (1) Have you read your hospital's MIP? (2) Do you know where you can access your hospital's MIP guidelines? (3) Do you know what role you would play if an MIP came into effect while you are on call?We compared data from MTCs and non-MTCs using multinomial mixed proportional odds models. RESULTS: There was a modest difference between responses from individuals at MTCs and non-MTCs for question 2 (OR=2.43, CI=1.03 to 5.73, p=0.04) but no evidence of a difference between question 1 (OR=1.41, CI=0.55 to 3.63, p=0.47) and question 3 (OR=1.78, CI=0.86 to 3.69, p=0.12). Emergency medicine and anaesthetic registrars showed significantly higher preparedness and knowledge across all domains. No evidence of a systematic difference in specialty response by MTC or otherwise was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Confidence in using MIPs among specialty registrars in England remains low. Doctors at MTCs tended to be better prepared and more knowledgeable, but this effect was only marginally significant. We make several recommendations to improve education on major incidents.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil/métodos , Hospitais/normas , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/prevenção & controle , Centros de Traumatologia/normas , Defesa Civil/tendências , Hospitais/tendências , Humanos , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Centros de Traumatologia/tendências
17.
Value Health ; 24(5): 625-631, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933230

RESUMO

The potential health and economic value of a vaccine for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is self-evident given nearly 2 million deaths, "collateral" loss of life as other conditions go untreated, and massive economic damage. Results from the first licensed products are very encouraging; however, there are important reasons why we will likely need second and third generation vaccines. Dedicated incentives and funding focused explicitly on nurturing and advancing competing second and third generation vaccines are essential. This article proposes a collaborative, market-based financing mechanism for the world to incentivize and pay for the development of, and provide equitable access to, second and third generation COVID-19 vaccines. Specifically, we propose consideration of a Benefit-Based Advance Market Commitment (BBAMC). The BBAMC uses health technology assessment to determine value-based prices to guarantee overall market revenues, not revenue for any specific product or company. The poorest countries would not pay a value-based price but a discounted "tail-price." Innovators must agree to supply them at this tail price or to facilitate technology transfer to local licensees at low or zero cost to enable them to supply at this price. We expect these purchases to be paid for in full or large part by global donors. The BBAMC therefore sets prices in relation to value, protects intellectual property rights, encourages competition, and ensures all populations get access to vaccines, subject to agreed priority allocation rules.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Saúde Global/economia , Programas de Imunização/economia , COVID-19/economia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/economia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Defesa Civil/métodos , Defesa Civil/tendências , Competição Econômica/normas , Competição Econômica/tendências , Saúde Global/tendências , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
19.
Lupus Sci Med ; 8(1)2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33875571

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a survey exploring the experience of patients with SLE facing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) shortage that occurred during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A survey was designed by Lupus Europe's patient advisory network and distributed through its social media, newsflash and members' network. People with lupus were asked about their last HCQ purchases and their level of anxiety (on a 0-10 scale) with regard to not being able to have access to HCQ, once in April 2020 (first wave) and after 11 August (second wave). The results were compared. RESULTS: 2075 patients responded during the first wave; 1001 (48.2%) could get HCQ from the first place they asked, 230 (11.1%) could get the drug by going to more than one pharmacy, 498 (24.0%) obtained HCQ later from their usual pharmacy and 126 (6.1%) from other sources. 188 (9.1%) could not get any; 32 (1.5%) did not respond to this question. All countries showed significant improvement in HCQ availability during the second wave. 562 (27.4%) patients reported an extremely high level of anxiety in wave 1 and 162 (10.3%) patients in wave 2; 589 (28.7%) and 268 (17.1%) patients reported a high level of anxiety in wave 1 and wave 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The HCQ shortage had a significant impact on patients with SLE and has been responsible for psychological consequences including anxiety. Indeed, despite an objective improvement in drug availability, the event is leaving significant traces in patients' mind and behaviours.


Assuntos
Ansiedade , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Hidroxicloroquina , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Antirreumáticos/provisão & distribuição , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/etiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Defesa Civil/métodos , Defesa Civil/normas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/psicologia , Angústia Psicológica , SARS-CoV-2 , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
Fertil Steril ; 115(4): 870-873, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33832742

RESUMO

All in vitro fertilization programs and clinics should have a plan to protect fresh and cryopreserved human specimens (embryos, oocytes, sperm) and to provide contingencies for continuation or cessation of patient care in the event of an emergency or natural disaster. This document replaces the document titled "Recommendations for development of an emergency plan for in vitro fertilization programs: a committee opinion," last published in 2016 (Fertil Steril 2016;105:e11-3).


Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , Defesa Civil/métodos , Criopreservação/métodos , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Comitês Consultivos/tendências , Defesa Civil/tendências , Criopreservação/tendências , Transferência Embrionária/métodos , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Oócitos/fisiologia , Oócitos/transplante , Gravidez , Espermatozoides/fisiologia , Espermatozoides/transplante
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA